Tim Bement

A motion was made by Mr. Bement and seconded by Mr. Shaw and carried to determine that there is a preponderance of reliable, probative and substantial evidence to make the specified findings required

A motion was made by Mr. Shaw and seconded by Ms. Patterson and carried to determine that there is convincing evidence required under R.C.G.O. §150.120.10 (D)(2) and approve the application for a Use

BZA Case PLN2026-00231 - 2135 N Gettysburg Avenue

BZA Case PLN2026-00233 - 4475 Old Troy Pike

determine that there is clear and convincing evidence required under R.C.G.O. §150.120.10 (D)(2) and approve the application for a Use Variance with the following conditions: 1. Saw-cut the parking lo

determine that there is not clear and convincing evidence required under R.C.G.O. §150.120.10 (D)(2) and deny the application for a use variance.

Case PLN2026-00192 - 426 S James H McGee BLVD Use Variance

Case PLN2026-00182 - 136 HEID AVE Use Variance

Found that standards for approval were not met.

A motion was made by Ms. Graham and seconded by Ms. Patterson and carried to that there is a preponderance of reliable, probative, and substantial evidence to make the specified findings required unde

A motion was made by Ms. Patterson and seconded by Mr. Bement and carried to that there is a preponderance of reliable, probative, and substantial evidence to make the specified findings required unde

A motion was made by Mr. Bement and seconded by Mr. Craig and carried to that there is a preponderance of reliable, probative and substantial evidence to make the specified findings required under R.C

PLN2026-00150 – 4389 W. Third Street Variance

PLN2026-00156 – 1401 N. Keowee Street Variance

PLN2026-00148 – 359 Maryland Avenue Conditional Use and Variance